TASK REQUIREMENTS
- BUILD the project as per your design drawing.
- Accurately calculate surface AREA and VOLUME of the entire model's three-dimensional shape.
CONDITIONS: Completion at home.
DUE DATE: April 20th 2009 – see METROLOGY UNIT ASSIGNMENT DUE DATE ON THE WIKI.
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENT: three 3D shapes must be included to earn passing grade!
Criterion
|
6-5
|
4-3
|
2-1
|
0
|
Creative or novel design
|
Project is unlike any examples and exceeds minimum requirements. Construction is neatly done and represents exemplary work. |
Project is unlike any examples and meets minimum requirements.
|
Project bears some resemblance to examples or to other students or only meets minimum requirements. |
Project does not meet any requirements or is a replica of an example. [Student may redo project at home after due date for grade up to 3 provided project is unique and dissimilar to all other projects.] |
Sizes, required design elements, and other specifications.
|
The project meets requirements outlined in the specifications for size and other required design elements. The project includes innovative design features that exceed the project specifications. |
The project meets most requirements outlined in the specifications for size and other required design elements.
|
The project meets some requirements outlined in the specifications for size and other required design elements. |
The student has demonstrated very little or no understanding of project requirements, and/or has not completed the task to match any of the descriptors for this criterion. |
Project meets specifications, sizes, colors and design of A4 Dimensioned Sketch
|
The project appears as outlined in the design sketch. Any additional elements or design adjustments have been minor to meet practical considerations. Materials and dimensions exactly as described in sketch.
|
The project appears as outlined in the design sketch, but has significant adjustments which are described in an accompanying written explanation. Materials and dimensions similar as described in sketch. |
The project mostly appears as outlined in the design sketch, unless an accompanying written explanation is submitted.
(1 point: No written explanation is submitted but student explains changes from sketch orally). |
The student has demonstrated very little or no understanding of the topic, and/or has not completed the task to match any of the descriptors for this criterion. |
Construction quality of project
|
Quality of construction and presentation exceeds standards expected of a Grade 8 science student. The project is robust enough to withstand display in the science classroom. Project conveys impression of significant time, design & creativity investment. |
Quality of construction and presentation is consistent with standards expected of a Grade 8 science student. The project is robust enough to withstand display in the science classroom. Project demonstrates attention to criteria. |
Quality of construction and presentation has some presentation problems or failures during display caused by poor construction quality or construction demonstrates haste and minimal planning. |
The student has demonstrated very little or no understanding of construction requirements, and/or has not completed the task to match any of the descriptors for this criterion. |
| Student self graded total = |
|
|
|
|
| Teacher graded total= |
|
|
|
|
Rubric to Grade Conversion
Rubric
|
Ruric |
Percent |
Grade |
| /30 |
/24 |
/100 |
letter |
| 29.4-30 |
24
|
100 |
A+
|
| 28.8 |
23 |
96 |
A
|
| 28.2-28.5 |
22 |
94-95 |
A-
|
| 27.1-28.1 |
21 |
91 |
B+ |
| |
20 |
88-90 |
B |
| |
19 |
86 |
B- |
| |
18 |
84-85 |
C+ |
| |
17 |
80-82 |
C |
| |
16 |
76-78 |
C- |
| |
15 |
75 |
D+ |
| |
14 |
72-73 |
D |
| |
13 |
70-71 |
D- |
| |
≤ 12 |
≤ 69 |
F |
RETURN to WIKI HOME PAGE
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.